Pelosi wants to 'rename' the public option

By Rick Moran
What is it about liberals that they think they have to fool people into supporting them?Run as a nice, safe moderate only to become screaming leftists once in office. It really shows they have no confidence that the substance of their ideas can stand scrutiny much less win out in a fair fight with the right.The latest manifestation of this is Nancy Pelosi suggesting that we "rename" the public option. Matt Sedensky of the Seattle Times notes:A government-sponsored "public option" for health care lives, though it may be more attractive to skeptics if it goes by a different... (Read Full Article)

(Click Here to go to Main Comments Page)

Join the Discussion

38 Comments | Post Comment

Posted by: DL  
Oct 27, 09:04 AM

The proposed renaming implies it has competion or the public will have a choice. Does that mean insurance companies will be allowed to sell across state lines? That the policies we buy won't be forced to include "coverage" for things we don't want like hair plugs?

Further, the talk about states being able to "opt out" raises serious questions. Specifically, how will the states be penalized if they choose to opt out? Do they lose some portion of federal funding for mandated Medicare/Medicaid, education, highway funds, etc.? Will states that choose to opt out be forced to cover people from other states (which take the plan) who travel there (under the guise of interstate commerce and/or recognizing and honoring agreements from other states)?

Is someone going to ask Pelosi these and related questions?

Posted by: UA  
Oct 27, 09:08 AM

A goat's head on a pig...that's a pretty apt description of Pelosi.

Posted by: wodiej  
Oct 27, 09:16 AM

LMAO!! Thanks for a good laugh, cripes, they are scrapping the bottom of the barrel in desperation. The fact is, most Americans realize they can't balance a budget to save their soul. Post Office, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,Medicare, Medicaid, SS, Federal government-all BROKE.

Dept of Energy created in 1977 to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. We have a dependence of 16,000 workers and no less dependent on foreign oil. War on poverty began 45 years ago, $1 trillion dollars of our tax dollars confiscated and redistributed each year and we have more moochers than ever on the dole. 2010 can't come soon enough.

Posted by: Bug-Eyed Buckeye  
Oct 27, 09:18 AM

"A pig is still a pig - even if you dress it up in a prom dress." Or put lipstick on it.

That these people continue to think that the unwashed masses are ignorant and stupid and will be fooled and soothed by renaming something is what is angering the public and killing this administration.

Posted by: DaveT  
Oct 27, 09:35 AM

If it is so perfect, why lie Nancy? Reid said the vast majority of the public supports a public plan, then if so, why rename it Nancy?

The democrats have only one mode, lie.

Posted by: Hitchhiker  
Oct 27, 09:38 AM

"Does "everyone" really say 'there's got to be a better name for this?' Not that I've heard." Me either, lol. Standard procedure for leftists though. The illusory everyone is doing it mantra. The imaginary consensus on global warming being a very large example of this tactic. Children.

Posted by: powhitemale  
Oct 27, 09:46 AM

if we're gonna rename it, let's just call it what it is SOCIALIZED MEDICINE!

Posted by: papaya  
Oct 27, 09:50 AM

Rule to live by: if Democrats title actions for the "public good" remember in actuality its just the opposite (ie Fairness Doctrine, Net Neutrality, Competitive Option).

Posted by: prayerful patroness  
Oct 27, 09:52 AM

IDIOCY!

DO OR DIE TIME.

THE END OF THE END FOR THESE LUNATICS.

AMERICANS BLESS GOD!

Posted by: Reggie  
Oct 27, 09:54 AM

A rose by any other name ... still has thorns.

Posted by: Joe S  
Oct 27, 09:56 AM

Where is the main stream media? Is the fourth estate in foreclosure? The only way politicians can get away with such drivel is for the press to be seen and not heard. Their job is to question and ferret out the details. Now Nancy if you haven't read the bill how do you know whats in it and how do you know how much it will cost and how do you where the money is going to come from? Now Nancy if you add a whole bunch of people and don't add doctors and nurses and hospitals and other health care workers who is going to provide the services? Now Nancy if the government can't run any number of other agencies how can it possibly run healthcare? Now Nancy why is it that the only people who can truly opt out will be in Congress? Now Nancy if you force people to buy healthcare how does this not hurt poor people who have trouble feeding their families? Now Nancy how can we have competition if the government sets all the rules and has an endless supply of money? Now Nancy when will you wake up and realize that the American people don't want the government telling their doctors what the most cost effective way of treating them is? Now Nancy I guess the real question is when will you wake up?

Posted by: Call me Lennie  
Oct 27, 10:02 AM

Or to paraphrase Mark Steyn:

If you put a scoop of ice cream on a pile of excrement, it's still going to taste mostly like excrement

Posted by: Bruce Hanson  
Oct 27, 10:36 AM

This whole ruse is based on guilt, guilt of those people who are entitled to someone else’s money. Somehow they believe that they can make their parasitic life meaningful if they spread wealth around. It’s just so noble for liberals to be charitable with money earned by someone else. And then there are those Hollywood types who are guilty about making so much money simply because their on the silver screen. It all boils down to hardworking private sector people held responsible for appeasing guilt feelings of parasites. If Pelosi is so benevolent let her use her own money to be so. What’s next Pelosi, people entitled to get stoned and lay on the couch all day and someone else pays for the luxury? Oh I’m mistaken, she already voted for that.

Posted by: Hugh J. Peightreeuht  
Oct 27, 10:39 AM

She's just trying to fool the dumb, illiterate, unwashed serfs.

Hey Nancy, you still calling the CIA a bunch of liars?

I can't figure out if she is a sleeping dog or lying bitch.

Posted by: llr  
Oct 27, 10:51 AM

Let them rename it. They will appear as desperate as they actually are.

They can pull the plug on "public option" but the crappy bill will remain alive and well and we all know it.

Posted by: Jake  
Oct 27, 11:07 AM

The liberal... I mean progressive wants to rename the public option, now that everybody knows how sleezy it is. The public option not the liberal.... I mean the progressive.

Posted by: Stnmikita  
Oct 27, 11:08 AM

They can attempt to rename it whatever they want with their thinly veiled "unspeak/newspeak" 1984 garbage.

Ultimately, people call it what they want, which works out pretty well. Swine flu is still swine flu, the war on man-caused disasters seems to still be the war on terror, and the public option will remain the public option regardless of some pointless re-branding effort.

No one wants this except a few, far-left maniacs. Unfortunately, they are all in power, and will apparently go to their graves jamming their ideology down our throats and destroying our country in the process.

Sickening on a daily basis.

Posted by: Harod  
Oct 27, 11:16 AM

ok rename it "happy fun option"

Posted by: NaClH2O  
Oct 27, 11:23 AM

I know, we should call it "The Nancy Plan" that way we know what it is without any mystery.

Posted by: dookyhh  
Oct 27, 11:47 AM

Renaming it is a great idea- how about "the final healthKare solution" or "the Stalin option" or "Das HealthKare" or "the sugar coated rock option" or "the something for nothing option" or "SuperDoublePlusGood Kare"......?

Posted by: llr  
Oct 27, 12:02 PM

How about The American Reduction Act.

Posted by: JRG3  
Oct 27, 12:08 PM

Typical Nancy Pelosi leadership. She seems to be learning from Mr Obama.

Rather than address the faults in her plan she wants to make it more marketable by renaming it. Pour on the smoke and mirrors! Fake out the public with an acceptable title or slogan, just like most of the laws they pass. How deceitful is that? Pelosi is delusional. It's way to late and way too many people know about this horror the Democrats have concocted to get any traction from a goofy name change. If the 'public option' was a worthwhile concept, the average American citizen would recognize it and support it. Pelosi knows she's trying to sell s**t in a sack so the only way she can succeed is to call it sugar instead. Shame on you Nancy!!

Posted by: Rightwingfeather  
Oct 27, 12:42 PM

Who would know more about lipstick on a pig than Nancy?

Posted by: Tel...  
Oct 27, 01:19 PM

The contempt people like Pelosi must have for Americans is staggering to contemplate.
This woman is an insult.

Posted by: kenny komodo  
Oct 27, 01:41 PM

I heard this sound byte on the Limbaugh show this morning. Why doesn't anyone ask either of these two liberal morons that if they want more "competition" why not simply allow insurance companies to peddle their policies across state lines?? There are about 1300 or so insurance companies selling health insurance policies. Why would the addition of just one more "company", in the form of the U.S. government, significantly add to the competitive nature of the business? If these companies could compete across state lines there would be competition in the capitalist model. Nasty Pelosi and her acolytes think they're fooling the people. Guess again Auntie Nan.

Posted by: Stephanie Hunter  
Oct 27, 01:49 PM

It's called marketing. It's the same reason Starbucks doesn't have a small size. Silly, yes, normal though. The reality is that we should be looking at plans that are already working with public support. There's a non-profit in Ohio that's doing great. I forget the name, but something like health care source or something. I read the other day that it's running in the black and serving nearly 1 million people. The same could happen on a larger scale!

Posted by: The Lover of Liberty  
Oct 27, 02:37 PM

Thank God for Joe Lieberman! As a conservative, I disagree with Sen. Lieberman on many issues, however, I am willing to give credit where it is due. Mr. Lieberman's courageous stance today against the radical left's so-called "public option" was an answer to prayer. Thanks go to Joe for putting his country ahead of partisan politics.

Posted by: Lil' Teapot Dome  
Oct 27, 03:17 PM

A pig is still a pig, even in a prom dress.

Likewise, Skeletor is still Skeletor even if you call him Madam Speaker.

Posted by: almostacowboy77  
Oct 27, 03:20 PM

I can't wait until Nazi Pe-lousey is renamed......."FORMER Speaker of the House".

Posted by: Voter X  
Oct 27, 03:51 PM

Pelosi should really try to confuse people and call it the Undocumented Competitive Worker Climate Option Change.

Posted by: Bill Sr.  
Oct 27, 03:57 PM

You have to hand it to Nancy, she sticks to her gun with her finger always on the trigger, even when it's pointed at her.
We should, however, keep Obama and Biden off the same plane, train, or bus as our number one national security measure.

Posted by: annsnewfriend  
Oct 27, 05:58 PM

You mean it's not being paid for with our "public dollars"! Does this mean the drinks are on Nancy? All her Lady's concern for the poor and down-trodden ... so genteel like, her being a millionaire and all, and we just being serfs. Oh, Nancy, Nancy -- ye'll never really appreciate the private sector til you'r back in't.

(Anybody know how we can get Nancy a real job?)

Posted by: Ret. Marine  
Oct 27, 06:09 PM

Yeah and we want to rename her GITOM-GIRL.

Posted by: Cali  
Oct 27, 06:53 PM

"Both suggested new terminology might get them past any lingering doubts among the public - or consumers or competitors." Idiot and idioter.

Posted by: Luap  
Oct 27, 10:29 PM

Words can't describe how incompetent, and literally stupid this woman is.... and she leads her party!!! The reason these people cannot tell the truth is twofold:
1. If they tell you what they really want to do.... they'd never get elected in the first place( except in a few places ).
2. They are simply incapable of honesty!

Posted by: Freedomfighter_99  
Oct 27, 11:00 PM

Let me help you out Nancy. How about the "Puppiers & Sunshine Option"?
Yeah. That'll work!

Posted by: VHG  
Oct 27, 11:40 PM

And what would she like to call Botox?

Posted by: Ranger Joe  
Oct 28, 01:20 PM

Twitch afflicted mental patient San Fran Nan is the Burlesque Queen in the Beltway Dem's 'Insane Clown Posse' Vaudeville show. Maybe she's a slave to meme doctor Noam Chomsky's persuasive voodoo alchemy of linguistic terminology and graphic symbolism....but the bulk of normal Americans ain't fooled that easily. You can't make chicken salad out of chickensh*t....but you can make a damn fool out of yourself trying. Every time her disturbing visage appears on Fox News at dinnertime I instinctively drop my fork....lose my appetite.... then take a long theraputic walk until the voices in my head subside. I have lost 15 lbs. so far! Go Nancy!



Goto: SearchLog Out
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum. Login or Register
ATsupport2.jpg