 |
|
|||
Report This Message
Are you sure you want to report this post?
You may optionally give an explanation for why this post was reported, which will be sent to the moderators along with the report. This can help the moderator to understand why you reported the post.
Re: George W. 'Deer in Headlights' Bush
Posted by: Anonymous
Date: 12/28/2008 12:33PM
sailormike Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ". . .I don't ever remember the president
> constantly being referred to as a liar by the
> opposition."
>
> I do.
>
> Bill Clinton is STILL hated and vilified every DAY
> by some right wing source. And his WIFE who has
> never been indicted much less convicted - of
> ANYTHING.
>
> As for Obama we do NOT expect nor do we WISH
> anything from the right but mindless hate and
> baseless vilification and unreasoned obstruction.
>
> As Our Glorious Leader might say, "Bring it on!"
Oh but my dear man, you left out one salient point: Clinton DID lie and was impeached for it. That is a matter of public legal record. His wife has been publicly exposed as a liar (Bosnia sniper fire just for a starter). When someone IS a liar, it is expedient to call them a liar. Bush was ACCUSED of being a liar. Many mistakes he has made, but lying isn't his nature as it is with the Clintons and Hussein and his crowd. The Obamanation messiah has been proven to be a LIAR even before he gets into the oval office. Just imagine what will happen when he gets in!
For those of you who think Bush will be treated kindly by history, you forget that history is written by the victors. When this nation fades into history because of the socialists morons in power, the immediate history will be written by marxists. Kruschev was right, they will bury us as a nation, but it comes from within. A thousand years from now after the world enters a new Dark Age where much of modern knowledge will be lost to barbarianism, historians will be looking at ancient history much like we look at Roman and Greecian history. They will analyze and rank our past leaders just as we rank their leaders. Then, and only then, will Bush be viewed more favorably.
His greatest failure is the failure to communicate, and failure to defend himself would come in second. He allowed his enemies (and ours) to shape his agenda. A good man he is. He did what he could to defend the country and succeeded, but he failed to stand up to the internal enemies. His failure to name the outside enemy (I will: Islam) is the result of his vain attempt to believe that all human beings are really good at heart. "Islam is a great and peaceful religion" comes to mind. He worked with Kennedy and the RINOS as he believed that at heart they had good intentions. We needed a good honest man like Bush, but one more astute and willing to stand up to his enemies. The Obamanation is neither.
-------------------------------------------------------
> ". . .I don't ever remember the president
> constantly being referred to as a liar by the
> opposition."
>
> I do.
>
> Bill Clinton is STILL hated and vilified every DAY
> by some right wing source. And his WIFE who has
> never been indicted much less convicted - of
> ANYTHING.
>
> As for Obama we do NOT expect nor do we WISH
> anything from the right but mindless hate and
> baseless vilification and unreasoned obstruction.
>
> As Our Glorious Leader might say, "Bring it on!"
Oh but my dear man, you left out one salient point: Clinton DID lie and was impeached for it. That is a matter of public legal record. His wife has been publicly exposed as a liar (Bosnia sniper fire just for a starter). When someone IS a liar, it is expedient to call them a liar. Bush was ACCUSED of being a liar. Many mistakes he has made, but lying isn't his nature as it is with the Clintons and Hussein and his crowd. The Obamanation messiah has been proven to be a LIAR even before he gets into the oval office. Just imagine what will happen when he gets in!
For those of you who think Bush will be treated kindly by history, you forget that history is written by the victors. When this nation fades into history because of the socialists morons in power, the immediate history will be written by marxists. Kruschev was right, they will bury us as a nation, but it comes from within. A thousand years from now after the world enters a new Dark Age where much of modern knowledge will be lost to barbarianism, historians will be looking at ancient history much like we look at Roman and Greecian history. They will analyze and rank our past leaders just as we rank their leaders. Then, and only then, will Bush be viewed more favorably.
His greatest failure is the failure to communicate, and failure to defend himself would come in second. He allowed his enemies (and ours) to shape his agenda. A good man he is. He did what he could to defend the country and succeeded, but he failed to stand up to the internal enemies. His failure to name the outside enemy (I will: Islam) is the result of his vain attempt to believe that all human beings are really good at heart. "Islam is a great and peaceful religion" comes to mind. He worked with Kennedy and the RINOS as he believed that at heart they had good intentions. We needed a good honest man like Bush, but one more astute and willing to stand up to his enemies. The Obamanation is neither.
You may optionally give an explanation for why this post was reported, which will be sent to the moderators along with the report. This can help the moderator to understand why you reported the post.
|